at a glanceat a glance f.a.q.f.a.q. downloadsdownloads videosvideos
Welcome to Cape Wind stay informed!  
America's First Offshore Wind Farm on Nantucket Sound
Stay Informed!

For the latest news about the Cape Wind project:

Check out our new blog:

Cape Wind Voices




Follow us on Twitter!




Become a Facebook fan!

Stay informed by email, mail or phone! [go>>]

Quotes of Note

This [Cape Wind project] is precisely the kind of renewable energy that pretty much every Earth Day speech since 1970 has demanded that we develop. Now that it's finally here, though--now that we're talking about particular windmills in particular places, not abstract and squeaky clean 'wind power'--people aren't so sure...But I've given my share of Earth Day speeches, and seen the effect they had. Sooner or later you've got to do something.

-- Bill McKibben, Author of The End of Nature





Printer friendly page  print story

Abuse of process imperils Cape Cod wind project
Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Portland Press Herald Editorial

In a classic display of back-room politics, an Alaska Congressman is close to scuttling one of the most significant alternative energy projects ever.

Sen. Olympia Snowe, however, is in position to help kill a provision authored by Rep. Don Young that seems designed to limit the footprint of the Cape Wind project in Nantucket Sound in order to make it unfeasible.

Claiming that turbines interfered with marine radar in a British study, Young wants to force the Coast Guard to ban wind towers within 9,000 feet, of navigational channels. He argues that big ships in heavy traffic and fog-bound waters require this margin of safety.

Off-shore oil rigs are permitted within 500 feet of shipping channels. The closest of Cape Wind's proposed turbines would be 1,500 feet from shipping lanes.

Young's amendment was attached to the Coast Guard reauthorization bill during the House-Senate conference committee reconciliation process. What that means is the amendment was not approved in either chamber or considered by any other committee of Congress. It was not subjected to public review by any federal agency with jurisdiction over the matter, including the Coast Guard, the Department of Energy and the Army Corps of Engineers.

This maneuver basically slunk in the back door at the side of a man who's not shy about telling Congress to butt out of his state's preferred energy solution, drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Even the Coast Guard, on whose behalf Young is allegedly advocating, says the buffer is too restrictive.

Young has adopts the claims of Cape Wind critics, who can't look past the aesthetics to consider the broader energy picture. Yet the coastline they want to protect is vulnerable to the sea-level rise predicted to occur due to the unfettered burning fossil fuels.

As a member of the conference committee, Snowe ought to vote to reject Young's amendment, and let Cape Wind's alternative energy project succeed or fail on its merits.


Also in Opinions and Editorials:
· DPU should vet it closely, but Cape Wind still makes sense   (08/30/10)
· Regional Renewables   (08/19/10)
· Approve National Grid’s deal with Cape Wind   (08/11/10)