at a glanceat a glance f.a.q.f.a.q. downloadsdownloads videosvideos
Welcome to Cape Wind stay informed!  
America's First Offshore Wind Farm on Nantucket Sound
Stay Informed!

Stay informed by email, mail or phone about what's going on with the Cape Wind Project! [go>>]

Take Action!
IT'S EASY! Click here to generate an email, letter or fax to be sent to the Minerals Management Service to let them know you support clean energy! [go>>]





Printer friendly page  print story
Send this story to a friend  send story
Cape Wind passes major regulatory milestone
Tuesday, May 10, 2005

Boston, MA, – Marking a major milestone in the Cape Wind permitting process, the Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board (EFSB), the agency charged with ensuring a reliable energy supply at the least cost and environmental impact, voted today to approve the interconnection of Cape Wind’s buried electric cables to the electric transmission system in Massachusetts.

Cape Wind President Jim Gordon was pleased with the EFSB ruling. 

“At a time of record high energy costs and increasing dependence on foreign energy, we are pleased that the Energy Facility Siting Board has approved Cape Wind’s petition,” Gordon said.  “This is a significant milestone in moving the project forward and in providing significant renewable energy benefits to the region,” Gordon added.

The Board’s vote today adopted the EFSB staff’s Tentative Decision issued in July, 2004 to approve Cape Wind’s electric transmission cable.  The Tentative Decision states that, “the power from the wind farm is needed on reliability and economic grounds, and to meet the requirements of Massachusetts and regional renewable portfolio standards.”  Today’s vote follows a 32-month adjudicatory process that included 2,900 pages of transcripts and 932 exhibits. 

The EFSB report issued last July also stated the environmental benefits that Cape Wind would create, “Overall, the Siting Board concludes that the air quality benefits of the wind farm are significant, and important for Massachusetts and New England.”

Download the Final Decision:

Part 1 - p. 1-67
Part 2 - p. 68-134
Part 3 - p. 135-203